Popular Photography Magazine is Dead after 80 Years


Popular Photography Magazine is Dead after 80 Years
1937 - 2017

Comments

  1. I still have one of those F bodies and lenses.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stephen Russell I still have this one and the June 1964 issue of Popular Photography

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow that is holding onto too many magazines for me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That was a household staple growing up and I haven't seen a current issue for ages. You have a treasure in your 1964 issue.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stephen Russell Even though I subscribed to Popular Photography for more than 40 years, I only have a this one and a couple of others. This was one of the first ones I ever bought when I got into photography in High School.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ann Kennedy I used to keep way to many, but a few years ago I chose a few worthy treasures to keep and got rid of all the rest.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jim Burnside So true JIMMY. We just had an Italian deli close by me. In business 60 yrs same family but very minimal business last 2 yrs or so. But the whole week of closing they were slammed and people like NOOO don't shut down. And it was like really? Where were ya last year or more when we were struggling to pay light billl?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oshi Shikigami I would think this will be of interest to you so I want to make sure you see it. : )

    ReplyDelete
  9. Margaret Siemers, Yes indeed! I have been a reader of this publication for at least fifty years. My favorite issue was the one when they first set out to do a serious and consistent evaluation of quality cameras. They did the Leica M4 and the Nikon F. And after reading their shake down trials of both, ended up getting both cameras, when I could afford them. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I subscribed and loved this during the 90's but the internet has certainly changed how I gather information.

    ReplyDelete
  11. +Jim Burnside I try to give the local stores my business and do in many cases, but I have to be frugal too. I am hard-wired that way. For instance, today I went to 2 pet stores for Frontline. You can get a 3 dose pack for $25 online. Amazon Prime has it for $35. My regular pet store had it for $47.95. Thanks, no. I saw that the local pet supply chain had it for $35 so I went there. Well, it was $35 on their site but it was $58.95 in their store. They were not even being competitive with their own website. I talked to them and they "matched" their own price & got the sale. I remember when many retailers would say "we don't compete with online prices". Many of them have gone out of business. Retail has to change, acknowledge all their competitors or everything will be mail order and it will be a loss for us all. It's not an easy time for small businesses.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is hard to know how we can have a balance in the two sides, but I am always happy to hear intelligent thoughts from both sides. Thank you for your input on this subject Steve Hart.
    I have noticed that places with a presence both on line and in stores are giving better deals to one or the other at a time (sales promo) Makes me wonder if they are testing to see which venue is more profitable for them.
    Personally I like being able to go to a store and see things. However at Holiday Time I want nothing to do with the crowds there. Or I need the convenience of having something sent to me because of my health.
    I would hope to see both continue and flourish.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment